1701 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

�� �� C M 9Hx� H2� r! C] H� '��H�1 V1 H Hx [�7 O H l7 OH�y H t�*f0 (7 Y �] t"yZ HH gy ii f� C7 y �i�� HOtn � �� 1 � �11 ALLFN CURI2IL•R - AMF.NDED DGCISION SPU 5-85, Page -14- Vehicle Corcidor: The applicant will prnvide a 10-foot easement oc dPdication to the City to provide access to the linear access on the shor?line from 19th Av�nue S.E. and 15th Ave we S.E. This corridor wili be limited to pedestrian traffic and lightweiyht City maintenance vnhicles. 16. The major change of the revisec3 condition #27 is the �llowance of a lightweight City maintenance vehicle to use the 10 foot maintenance easement as provided in revised condition #20. (Ervine testmony) 1'. Proposed revised condition #40 is a condition not set [orth in the original document. It reads: A_ Project Phasing: That the applicant may phase the project as long as a site plan is submitted that meets all Shoreline Management Act requirements and the conditions oE this approval. B. Site Plan: A Final Site Plan for each phase must be submitted to and approved by the City prior to issuance of any building permits, showing all the modifications ,tipulated in SMA 5-85, subject to provisions of paragraph A above. 1f3. According to law, the 11pp1icant has five years to develop the property with the use of the Permit. It is his intention to phase develop the property and the City has voiced no objection to phasing. (Ervine testimony) 14. 20- Tlie pcoposed development is Located in an acea that is pa�t of the Silver I,ake Traffic Study that is currently being conduc:ted. (Ervine cestimony) The Silver Lake T:affic Study is being conducted for tlie purposes of identifying trafEic problems and congestion., ��1 � in the acea and proposinq solutionc to these problems. � The proposed development is a significant addition t� the area and will impact its traf.fic. Implementation of the Traffic Study and its proposal ; arr i�nc��:;sary prior to any Building Pertnits beinq i:;sued.