1830 126TH ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

Summary: My property has been compromised by the actions of the City of Everett, Snohomish County and t e Washington State Department of Transportation. The right to exclude others from one's property is considered one of the most essential rights of landowners. Taking a person's property to remedy � public problem not created by the person is not legal. FEMA says I am not eligible for flood insurance. I do not live in a flood way or flood plain, but now I live in a land of rising water. This is not of my doine�, but it was caused by development and la�d destniction which has an adverse impact on the environment by •ising the mid-basin for flood hazard control. See: 1993 Entranco EIS/527 Study 1934 blocks of SR 527 was not a la d of ris ng wat rYa f ood pla n tor flood way,area of 12600 and 12700 1963 My house and lot (1830 -126th St. SE Everett, WA) was purchased by me irom my parents, and the house was remodeled. Ownership papers were filed in 19G5. 1970 Harold Herschlip went t� th� WSDOT, Mr. Mateney, to let the 1NSDOT know that the 7 2 in. cross culvert #9.18 (12600 b�ock of SR 527) was biocked and was not draining properly from the west to east side of the highway. The cross culvert N 9.18 acted as a water equalizer to prevent surface water seep on the west side of the highway from undertnining the roadway bed. The original depth of the privately dug commercial fish pond was 18 feet The east side of the highway culvert was 12 inches above the pond on level land. WSDOT denied responsibility stating the back-up was caused by a dam. There was no dam, but there was a filter to prevent debris from filling and blocking the exit culvert of the pond. 1 g71 There was an 18 foot backup on the west side of the highway, due to the biocked cuivert, which caused flooding and the bss of my household contents in the my backyard and basement. Tt�e WSDOT disawwed responsibility. The next week WSDOT placed a 30 inch concentric cuivert with a drilling machine, replacing the blocked 12 inch culvert. The depth of the west sump was 10-12 feet with a width of 10•12 feet at the bottom. The top of it was 25 feet or larger, (cars ianded in the sump area, west side SR 527. especially at night, they accidentally went over the guard rail into the sump) There was no creek on the west side of my property. Debris fill biocking the culvert was caused by highway runoff 1975 I purchased the reminder of the property on west side of SR 527 highway. I could not afford the full purchase of the 2.5 acres in 1963. � 9B3 fMom Silve lal:e Lilly Pond while channeli g and�av n�g shou dersW ar unde5ilvc k e e�ln dditio aalGabias Wall was placed on the west side SR 527, (12600 block). Faulty procedures: The channel from 129 St. SE and Silvertake School connects into the cross cu vert #9.18 (12600 block SR 527) with a catch basin placed directly alwve the channel connecting south basin into the cross culvert. It is not acceptable to drain from une basin to another without an easement permit. Six inch barriers were placed on east side of widened highway (SR 527 12600 block ) with 12 foot opening above the culvert to catch basin . South basin highway runoff debris caused filling of the pnnd by 1987 up to approximately 12 inch depth 198G Sewers line was installed from south basin to 12600 block. This raised the water table on the west side of highway approximately 4-5 feet. By 198 as rO oodUlas s or bet eWthan/before full. 7he sewer easement agreement was to leave properry 9 sewer placement. Following the sewer placement, I was unable to use SQ to 100 feet of my property, but still had to pay taxes on it. The project destroyed my sump area because of culvert extension. The project also broke my house french drain was f unds and Silverlake Sewer company refused to fix it until a break in french drai� pipe naat�3 A.