Laserfiche WebLink
Energy. Contact appropriate utilities to confirm presence or absence of <br />facilities in the project corridor. <br />B. Utility Coordination — Coordinate with utility companies that are affected by <br />the project. Coordination includes submitting preliminary 30% plans for <br />review and technical input by utility companies. Plans will be distributed to <br />utilities in the project vicinity. A written record will be kept for all <br />communication with utility providers. <br />7.7 Potholing — Based on utility mapping, field information and survey data, identify <br />potential utility conflicts and assemble a list of recommended locations to pothole and <br />develop a potholing plan for the project. Coordinate with the City and subconsultant, <br />APS, to complete utility potholing and provide specific information such as <br />dimensions, location and depth. <br />7.8 30% Design Package —Based on the preferred alternative defined in the previous <br />subtask, a 30% design package, including preliminary plan set, will be developed for <br />the City's review. A preliminary engineer's opinion of probable construction cost <br />will be developed and will include a schedule of estimated quantities, unit prices, and <br />total preliminary opinion of construction cost for each element of the project. <br />7.9 City Review — Electronic copies of the 30% Design Package will be submitted to the <br />City for review and comment. A meeting will be conducted with the City to review <br />and'discuss comments. Written responses to review comments will be prepared and <br />submitted in a timely manner. <br />Assumptions: <br />1. <br />Alternatives will be limited to utility alignments for the storm drain network <br />within the City's right-of-ways and storm water detention ponds located in the <br />Legion Golf Course. <br />2. <br />The 30% design plan set will include approximately 35 plan sheets consisting <br />of, but not limited to, general plan sheets, storm drain plan and profiles, <br />detention pond plan and cross sections, legends for the locations for roadway <br />restoration and curb ramp replacements, and details of key elements. <br />3. <br />For the development of this scope of work and associated fee estimate, it is <br />assumed that the project will consist of approximately 9,100 linear feet of <br />storm drain piping, 11,000 linear feet of roadway restoration and the <br />replacement of 60 curb ramps at 20 intersections within the project area. <br />4. <br />City will participate in a workshop with the MSA team. <br />5. <br />City to conduct review of the preliminary design dravdngs, engineer's opinion <br />of probable construction cost and all supporting documentation with verbal or <br />written conu lents within fifteen (15) ,,vork_ing days after receivulg 30% design <br />6, <br />package. <br />•, <br />City to IJ 'J\_ 1l available aS-bull OCL i11�i S for i5 f;C11 i1 S, J'%alla,y_:. <br />c D;neer nr i'f=p ort,s; and otller regtie sted da '. <br />29 <br />I`;:., .-.: 7,—I—<i�i?'�'.. ';TTTa3 c... _ `.l i ,_ I1' f'. _\TOli'1\;CSi of ic1 �cp�13i��_11 <br />