Laserfiche WebLink
�. The authorizatlon ot the modlficaiion or <br />variation will not be detrimental to the public <br />walfnre or injuriaus to property in the vicinity <br />or zone in vhich the property is vacated; end <br />�• A hardshlp would be incurred by the <br />epplicent 1P he complied vlth the striot <br />application oP the requlations. <br />The 15' wide public eccess road to the wet pond <br />reduces the lot width beloa the required 50'. <br />There is sufficient lot width to ellow for e <br />reasoneble bullding site. <br />Concluslon: The proposed short subdivision meets all <br />zoning requirementa excep[ for Lot 7. Lot � meete <br />the criterie for variation Erom lot width. <br />� <br />C. Neturel Hnvironeent - Evaluation of the impacts end <br />provision for mitigetion of ell lmpacts on ell <br />elemente o! the naturel environment including <br />topography, vegetation, soils, geology end ell <br />onvironnental issues as detined in the State <br />Environmental Policy Act, WAC 197.11 and Chepter 18.24. <br />Pindings: The site conteins an environmentelly <br />seneitive erea es shown on ehe aurvey mep dated <br />September 1991. Pigeon Creek No. 2 flowe northerly <br />through the eaetern portlon of the property. A <br />riperian wetland extends epproximetely 37� from <br />the atream'e edge. A seventy-five foot buf[er le <br />i•equlred from the edge of the vetland. <br />' Conclusions: A construction fence must be placed <br />i <br />along the edge o[ the wetlend buffer prior to <br />commencement of any construction ectivity on propoaed <br />Lot 2. <br />i D. Dreineqe - Evaluetlon ot ell dreinege Smpects end <br />provisions made for mitigetion of all Crainege impecte <br />�i es defined in the City�s Comprehensive Drelnaga <br />Ordinance end Chepter 18.2<. <br />I Pfndinqe: The proposed �roject ie loceted in the <br />i Piqeon Creek No. 2 Dreinege�Basin. <br />� <br />� Conclusiona: Dreineqe Smpects will be mitigeted by the <br />vetpond. <br />' E. Open Spaca - Eveluation of all impacta end provlsion <br />� for open space as deflned in Chepter 18.24. <br />FSnding: The R-2 zone allovs up to a meximum lot <br />coverege oP AOt by structures. The lots remeining <br />area wtll heve eome useable open epace. The butfer are <br />will be provide open apece. <br />. Conclusion: Adequate provieion for open space cen bo <br />,i provlded on each lot in this r:hort eubdivision. <br />i F. Public Syste�s Cepecity - Evaluetion of ell <br />impects end provisione mede for mitigation of <br />impac[s on public systeme including perks, schools, <br />and community facilities es detined Sn Chapter 18.24. <br />Pinding: The proposed ehort subdivision is in the <br />Everett School Dietrict. The Everett School Di�strict <br />has commented that Yhe cumulative nffect of short <br />subciivisions within tF,e city is havinq an adverse <br />impect on the District. <br />_p_ <br />