Laserfiche WebLink
0'Donnell, Dric,ham 6 Partners, N. W. E-154U <br />May 19, 1981 Page 11 <br />excaval:i��n With a large backtioe or dragline, or by some other <br />si�,itab)e mettiod that Will completely remove ttie soft organic <br />soils. If any of tl�ese soils are allowed to remain beneath the <br />f111s, they will create a potentially unstable slope plane. <br />Probing alorg the edge of the sw�mp indicates that the organic <br />mater.ials extend to a deptli of up to about nine (9) feet in the <br />area oE tlie pro��osed slope. Tlie excavation will extend below <br />the groundwater level. Tliis will require deWatering of ttie <br />excavation before structur.al fills are placed, or by placing <br />rock to a point above ttie water level to provide a firm base for <br />the placement oE structuial fill. Bither meChod will require <br />close coordination between the contrar.tor and Carth Consultants, <br />Inc. Ple suggest that a pce-construction meeting be held to <br />evaluate the contraotors procedures for the placement of this <br />and ott:er deep fills. <br />The removal of the organic materials should be conducted in <br />relatively short sections and in ,uch a manner as to provide an <br />essentially hor{zontal sucface on which Co plare and key the <br />structural fill toe of tl�e proposec] :lope. Tlie structural fill <br />should be placed and compacled as rapidly as possible to a point <br />above ttie surface of tlie existin9 swamp betore tlie excavation ot <br />tl�e adjacent section is begun. Curllier, once the structural <br />fill begins to extend up tlie existing site grade it will be <br />necessary to bench the fill into tl�e existing slope. <br />All structural fill sliould be placed on stable ground in <br />eigl�t (0) to ten (10)-incli tliick loose lifts and compacted to a <br />minimum of 95 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM <br />D-1557-70 (Plodtfied Proctor). Fills sliould be benctie�i as tliey <br />are placed on slopes steeper than 4:1.(horizontal:vertical). <br />The upper slte soils and existing tills contain an excessive <br />amount oE fines wl�icli were wet at tlie time of our field explora- <br />tion. TIiIs condition may make tliem difficult to work or com- <br />pact in their present state. We do not recommend their use as <br />structural fill during wet weather or when the in-place moisture <br />content is more than two (2) percent above the optimum moisture <br />c�ntent. The lower till sotls may be suitable for structural <br />fills provided ttiey are worked duriix� dry weatlier. If any of <br />the grading is to be conducted duriiig wet weather, we recommend <br />that granular naterials witi� a maximum size ot tWu (2) inclies, <br />containing less than 5 percent Cines, (material passing the No. <br />200 steve) be used for struclural f.ill. Uuring dry weather, <br />ottier granular materials, including ttie site till soils, nay be <br />used provided the;� can be properly compacted. • Imported Eill sam- <br />ples st�ould be submitted to Eartl� Consultants, Inc. Eor evalua- <br />tion prior to brinying them on the site. 7'he placement ot the <br />structural till chould be moni Corr��l ancl Cest��d by Earl:h Consul- <br />tanCs, Inc. <br />Fi,iL• G��isullnnls, Inc. <br />