My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3528
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 3528
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2017 10:19:57 AM
Creation date
4/25/2017 10:19:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
3528
Date
9/18/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conclusions: <br /> • Appellants offered no data or analysis to the record to support their contention that the <br /> impact assistance program represents a shift of mitigation responsibilities, or that the <br /> reliance on tax revenues is inappropriate as a means of mitigation. <br /> • Snohomish County was an active participant on the Committee which reviewed the <br /> methodology which ultimately formed the basis for the mitigation program and offered <br /> no opposition to the chosen method, the FIA. <br /> • The FIA is an appropriate means of assessing impacts, expenditures and mitigation across <br /> multijurisdictional boundaries. <br /> • The State is the largest recipient of tax revenues from the Boeing Expansion and, <br /> therefore, is the appropriate source for the focus of an impact assistance program. <br /> • The City properly applied its SEPA policies in requiring mitigation where impacts were <br /> identified, in a manner that was reasonable, balanced and in accordance with SEPA. <br /> • Local, state and federal agencies have jurisdictional responsibilities to mitigate impacts <br /> using existing mechanisms and revenue sources. <br /> • Revenues generated by this proposal will be sufficient to allow local, state and federal <br /> agencies to decide how and at what level to mitigate population driven impacts. <br /> Decision: <br /> Deny the appeal and affirm the Decision Document as written with regard to this issue. <br /> SECTION 45: MITIGATION FOR LOW INCOME CHILD CARE SERVICES, CHILD <br /> ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT SERVICES, INFORMATION <br /> AND REFERRAL SERVICES, LOW INCOME HEALTH SERVICES, <br /> FUNDING FOR AREA FOOD BANKS AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND <br /> HOMELESS SHELTER SERVICES. <br /> Findings: <br /> • The EIS analysis considered the impacts of 55,000 people, not households, in the seven- <br /> county study area on human services programs, including: low income child care <br /> services; child abuse prevention and treatment services; information and referral services; <br /> low income health services; funding for area food banks; and homeless shelter services. <br /> Of these 55,000, approximately 29,000 are expected to be residents of Snohomish <br /> County. <br /> 66 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.