Resolution 3528 - Laserfiche WebLink

• The record does not include data or analysis supporting the appellant's allegation. • Requirements included in the Decision Document reasonably mitigate impacts on wildlife and provide adequate wildlife corridors and open space. • The record contains adequate support for the Responsible Official's decision. • Information and analysis contained in the EIS indicate that the size, location, and vegetation of the required wildlife corridors are sufficient for wildlife habitat and movement (see DEIS App. E - Plants, Animals &Wetlands, pp E-42 through E-44). Decision: Deny the appeal and affirm the mitigation requirements for wildlife corridors as set forth by the Responsible Official in the Decision Document (Subarea 2b(3)Wildlife Corridors,Item i through iv,pp 27-28 of Staff Report). SECTION 6: WETLANDS AND WILDLIFE HABITAT Findings: • Wetland B is a palustrine forested wetland covering 1.84 acres. This wetland is dominated by Pacific Willow and has been rated a Category II wetland according to Title 37.090 EMC. • Wetland C is a palustrine forested wetland covering .55 acres. This wetland is dominated by Pacific Willow and has been rated a Category II wetland according to Title 37.090 EMC. • Wetland E is a palustrine forested wetland covering .03 acres. This wetland is dominated by Red Alder and has been rated a Category II wetland according to Title 37.090 EMC. • The area between wetlands B and C is a mixed forest community primarily dominated by deciduous trees with scattered coniferous trees (see DEIS App. E 1.1.1 for detailed description of existing upland plant communities). This area covers approximately 13 acres. • There are approximately 200 acres of upland mixed forest on the site. After development, approximately 125 acres will remain. In addition, 40 acres of upland will be enhanced with vegetation that will provide increased wildlife food and habitat. 8