Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> ■ Description of GC/CM and Design-Build delivery approaches. <br /> ▪ Preliminary comparison of applicability to the WPCF expansion. <br /> • Comparative summary of advantages and disadvantages including the City preferences <br /> identified in Task 1.1. <br /> • List of project level risks. <br /> • List of candidate evaluation criteria. <br /> ■ Implementation timelines. <br /> • Recommended alternative. <br /> • Draft Project Delivery Implementation Plan describing the steps required to implement <br /> chosen project delivery approach including obtaining State of Washington Certification, <br /> City Council authorization, issuing the RFP, evaluation of proposals, and contract <br /> execution. <br /> Task 1: Deliverables: <br /> • Draft and final report incorporating results and conclusions from Tasks 1.1 and 1.2. <br /> • Attendance at two client meetings. <br /> • SAIC will chair a third meeting with the City identifying the contents of the Draft Report. <br /> Task 2 — GC/CM Contractor Selection [REVISED] <br /> The following general scope description assumes that the GC/CM approach is identified as the <br /> preferred project delivery method. <br /> Subtask 2.1 — Project Management <br /> • SAIC will provide timely communication with the City.Project Manager on the status of <br /> and issues affecting the Owner's Advisor Contract's scope, schedule, and budget. <br /> • SAIC will conduct activities related to the management, administration and coordination <br /> of Owner's Advisor activities for this contract including: <br /> — Regular communication with the City's Project Manager <br /> - — Administration of the contract including preparation of monthly status reports and <br /> invoices <br /> Deliverables: - <br /> ■ Monthly status reports accompanying invoices which will summarize work completed <br /> during invoice period, and other issues of note. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> File: 001581 I 9651100046 March 28,2012 Page 5 of 19 <br /> 8 <br />