My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1215 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2017-07-28
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
1215
>
1215 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2017-07-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2017 7:20:24 AM
Creation date
6/22/2017 1:40:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
1215
Notes
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INCLUDED
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 29,2015 <br /> HWA Project No.2014-162-21 <br /> relatively near the ground surface. Whidbey formation generally consists of medium-bedded <br /> sand, silt and clay that were deposited in lake environments prior to the last glaciation. These <br /> soils have been glacially overridden and generally possess high shear strengths and low <br /> permeability. <br /> Subsurface Soil Conditions <br /> Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on results of our field explorations, review <br /> of available geologic and geotechnical data, and our general experience in similar geologic <br /> settings. In general, soil conditions at the subject site consist of surficial topsoil over fill soils <br /> that are underlain by Whidbey formation soils. At the toe of the rockery wall, we encountered <br /> surficial topsoil over advance outwash soils. Our interpretation of geologic conditions <br /> perpendicular to the length of the wall alignment is shown in Figure 3, Rockery Wall Profile <br /> A-A'. Each major soil unit is described below, with materials interpreted as being youngest in <br /> origin and nearest to the surface described first. <br /> • Topsoil—A thin layer of topsoil was encountered in all of the boring locations advanced <br /> along the wall alignment. The topsoil consisted of a combination of silty fine sand with <br /> abundant organics throughout. <br /> • Fill—A thin layer of fill was encountered in all of the boring locations. This fill consisted <br /> of loose, silty, fine gravelly sand with some thin areas of organic deposits. It is assumed <br /> that this fill was placed during the initial construction of the rockery walls. <br /> • Whidbey Formation—Whidbey formation soils were encountered in hand borings HH-1 <br /> and HH-2, located at the top of the upper and lower rockery walls. The Whidbey <br /> formation consists of stiff to very stiff, slightly gravelly, sandy silts and clays. The top of <br /> the formation was encountered at 4.6 feet bgs in boring HH-1 and 2.5 feet in boring <br /> HH-2. DCP test results obtained in the Whidbey Formation soils suggest that they posses <br /> high shear strength and significant cohesion. <br /> • Advance Outwash — Advance outwash soils, consisting of very dense, poorly graded <br /> sand with gravel, were encountered in hand boring HH-3. Advance outwash deposits <br /> consist of clean to slightly silty, fine to medium sand, with varying percentages of gravel. <br /> This advance outwash deposit was likely deposited during the Salmon Springs glaciation. <br /> Ground Water Conditions <br /> Ground water observed at the project site was limited to perched ground water near the base of <br /> the fill deposit encountered in hand boring HH-1. It should be noted, however, that these borings <br /> were advanced in October and do not reflect the maximum seasonal ground water levels. We <br /> would expect that seasonal perched ground water will accumulate over the Whidbey formation <br /> 2014-162 Letter Report 3 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.