Resolution 3072 - Laserfiche WebLink

I- - . to the issues raised by Council at the August 17, 1988 hearing, the 2 following information was generated by the Applicant and supplied to Council 3 for Council ' s consideration at the September 21 , 1988, public meeting: 4 5 1 . Wetlands. The applicant had contacted Department of Ecology and a meeting was scheduled for the field on 6 September 22, 1988, with DOE. 2. Traffic. David Enger of Transportation Planning Engineering prepared an additional report addressing 8 traffic issues which was submitted to Council . 9 3. The Evergreen Inventory - Landscaping Plan. Applicant inventoried the Evergreen trees on the site and indicated 10 to Council which trees could be saved. 11 4. Drainage Plan. Applicant submitted revised drainage plan which addressed the concerns of the City' s Public Works 12 Department. 13 5. Tot Lot. The tot lot was relocated to a more centralized location. 14 6. St. Peter' s House. The Historical Commission had met and 15 considered the issue of the St. Peter's house and felt that it may have some historical significance. The City 16 Attorney's Office advised the City Council that it could not recognize St. Peter' s house for historical significance 17 due to the fact that it was not properly listed on the City' s Historical Register at the time this Applicant 18 submitted its SEPA application to the City. 19 7. Lake Fill . City staff provided information concerning the required fill for Silver Lake which indicated that the 20 requirements for fill had been agreed upon by the City staff. 21 8. Monroe School . A letter was provided by the Everett School 22 District which indicated that the children may be bused to Monroe School . The Applicant indicated that it would not 23 be possible to obtain an easement across the adjoining property to gain access to 23rd Drive S.E. But 24th Drive 24 S.E. is possible and Staff will work with adjacent developer and DOE to accomplish this. The Applicant 25 indicated that it would be willing to pay Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) towards access if the City would acquire 26 an access easement either by purchase or condemnation. 27 9. Impervious Surface. Based upon new calculations, which include the roof surfaces, the project has been modified 28 and new figures addressing impervious surface will be included in the detailed drainage plan. 29 10. Site Plan. The Applicant submitted a new site plan which 30 was more detailed in nature. 31 32 2