Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 2. Zoning <br /> FindinE: The subject property is zoned M-1 Heavy Manufacturing <br /> Commercial/Industrial Flood Fringe Overlay District, which permits a <br /> broad range of activities. (The overlay district implements the <br /> Federal Flood Insurance Program at the local level. ) <br /> Conclusion: Any specific project proposed on the subject property <br /> will be reviewed through a separate Shoreline Permit hearing <br /> procedure. The proposed fill will flood proof the subject property <br /> by raising it above the 100-year flood elevation, which is consistent <br /> with the Flood Fringe District and the Federal Flood Insurance <br /> Program. <br /> 3. Water Dependency <br /> Finding: This could be suitable for water-related or water-dependent <br /> uses, but based on the substantial setback from the shoreline <br /> (approximately 200 feet) for the bulk of the property, non-water <br /> 1 <br /> dependent activities are anticipated. <br /> Conclusion: Since water-dependent, water-related activities are not <br /> proposed, the general public interest can only be met by providing <br /> increased opportunities for public access to the shoreline. <br /> I <br /> 4. Environmental Impacts <br /> Finding: The environmental impacts from the filling of the subject <br /> property were detailed in the Lowell Industrial Site Environmental <br /> Impact Statement prepared in 1978 and the Addendum to Lowell <br /> Industrial Site Final Environmental Impact Statement issued <br /> September 16, 1986. <br /> 1 <br /> Conclusion: The impacts of the proposed project have been adequately <br /> 1 addressed through the original EIS prepared on the project and the <br /> Addendum issued on September 16, 1986. <br /> 5. Buffer Zones and Wetland Areas <br /> Findings: The applicant is proposing a 50' riparian zone adjacent to <br /> the Snohomish River with the wetlands on site to remain in their <br /> natural state, with the exception being that approximately .9 acre of <br /> wetland is proposed to be filled where the settlement basin existed <br /> during the previous hydraulic fill. <br /> The riparian zone and wetland areas must address both the wildlife <br /> needs, the needs of the industrial park occupants, and the general <br /> public. <br /> General public access to the shoreline will be required in this <br /> development since the industrial park currently under consideration <br /> is not water-related/dependent. <br /> Conclusions: All wetland areas are to remain in their natural state <br /> unless improved for public access. The .9 of an acre fill proposed <br /> in old settling basin site should also be permitted. <br /> The development and landscaping of the buffer/riparian zone should be <br /> accomplished in a manner that will enhance existing vegetation, <br /> provide for pedestrain/bike movement and viewing of the water. <br /> -2- <br />