My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6307 36TH AVE W 2021-12-16
>
Address Records
>
36TH AVE W
>
6307
>
6307 36TH AVE W 2021-12-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2021 1:53:41 PM
Creation date
8/2/2017 2:27:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
36TH AVE W
Street Number
6307
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Current Development Proposal <br />The applicant is proposing a multi -unit, light -industrial business park on Lot 2 with access <br />roads, parking, and other associated infrastructure. Careful design considerations have <br />been taken to avoid all wetland and stream impacts while still providing feasible <br />development of the site. The buildings have been sited to accommodate the varied <br />topography of the site, with Buildings A and B elevated above Buildings C through E. A <br />shared access road will provide access from 36th Avenue West to all of the proposed <br />buildings. The access road joins 36th Ave. W at the northwest corner of the site where <br />topographic constraints are the least challenging. The topographic disparity between the <br />site and 36th Ave. W increases incrementally to the south. <br />Fill Slope and Buffer Averaging <br />To accommodate the access road along the northern property boundary the applicant is <br />proposing to reduce 12,779 square feet of buffer associated with Wetlands A and D, per <br />EMC 37.110.D. The reduced wetland buffers will be a minimum of 45-feet from the <br />standard 60-foot buffer. The proposed buffer impact areas are dominated by non -mature <br />red alder trees with a salmonberry understory. This is a pioneer habitat type that is very <br />common to disturbed sites in the Puget Sound area. Red alder provides relatively quick <br />cover to a disturbed site and is typically replaced by a slower -growing, longer -living <br />coniferous canopy. Over time, both the overstory and understory become diversified with a <br />variety of native species and vegetative structure, which are important elements to many <br />wildlife species. <br />As mitigation for reducing 12,779 square feet of buffer, the applicant is proposing to <br />designate 12,825 square feet of area as additional buffer. The additional buffer areas are <br />located on the north and east sides of Wetland A and between Wetlands A and D. The <br />additional buffer is composed of native forested and scrub shrub areas, resulting in no net <br />loss of functions or values. No significant trees are located in the outer edge of the reduced <br />buffer area. <br />Despite the careful placement of the access road, the topographic difference between the <br />site and 36th Avenue West requires a fill slope on the north side of the road. A fill slope is <br />proposed rather than a retaining wall due to the height of the wall that would be required <br />(up to 40 feet), its economic infeasibility, safety considerations, wildlife movement, and <br />impacts that would still occur from construction of a wall. The proposed fill slope is <br />designed at 3:1 (horizontal:vertical). <br />If a retaining wall was constructed in place of the proposed fill slope, several issues of <br />concern would result. The first would be public safety. A vertical wall that ranges up to 40 <br />feet tall is not conducive to an area designed for frequent semi -truck traffic. Furthermore, <br />construction of the wall would require heavy equipment access from its north side, likely <br />resulting in temporary buffer impacts similar to those proposed from the fill slope. Another <br />harmful issue created by construction of a wall would be the hindrance of wildlife <br />movement. Many small to large mammals would be able to utilize a fill slope for passage, <br />but would be impeded by a retaining wall. This is an important consideration in the project <br />vicinity due to the many forested acres that surround it and the abundance of wildlife <br />present. <br />Critical Area Study and Buffer Mitigation Plan 2 WRI# 09084 <br />Intermec- Lot 2 Revision#2: March 22, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.