Ordinance 1733-90 - Laserfiche WebLink

• 1 be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 2 Section 5: The base traffic for the Traffic Analysis shall 3 include existing traffic plus traffic generated by any project approved under SEPA and any proposed project currently under 4 review by the City, and any additional traffic reasonably deemed appropriate by the City's Traffic Engineer. This additional 5 traffic may include, but not be limited to, trips generated in other jurisdictions. A four (4) percent background growth factor 6 compounded annually shall be used to project the existing traffic to the required horizon year. 7 8 Section 4: That Section 7 of Ordinance No. 1670-89 which reads as 9 follows: 10 Section 7 : The analysis shall identify the transportation 11 system improvements necessary and shall include the estimated cost to construct the transportation system improvements needed 12 to return transportation facilities impacted by the development back to a level of service "D" as described in the critical 13 movement analysis for planning application as described in the National Transportation Research Circular No. 212, January, 14 1980. The analysis shall also include the percentage of development trips to total trips on each facility requiring 15 mitigation. 16 be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 17 18 Section 7: The method for determination of the Level of Service shall be the Critical Movement Analysis for Planning 19 Application as described in the National Transportation Research Circular No. 212, January, 1980. 20 21 Section 5: That Section 9 of Ordinance No. 1670-89 which reads as 22 follows: 23 Section 9: Transportation System Impact Mitigations 24 A. The analysis shall include a proposed mitigation plan. The mitigation may be either the construction of necessary 25 transportation improvements, or contribution to the City for the development' s fair share costs of identified future 26 transportation improvements. B. For those development proposals which will generate 27 fifty (50) or more additional (new) peak hour (inbound and outbound) trips from the site, the mitigation costs attributable 28 to the proposed development shall be the summation of the development' s costs associated with the following two types of 29 facility improvements (inclusions of County and State facilities shall be subject to appropriate interlocal agreements) : 30 1 . On transportation facilities where the need to 31 construct mitigation to a facility is directly related to the developments traffic and would not be 32 required at the horizon year if the development was not constructed, the cost for the mitigation will be entirely borne by the development. In the event the 3