WRK Engineers 10/18/2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Repair cost as a percentage of the building's overall replacement cost including structural,architectural,mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems.It does not include damage caused by breaksileaks in water and gas pipes or contents damage. * * * * * Minimal damage:Repair Cost likely less than 5°:;of building replacement cost. * * * * Moderate damage:Repair Cost likely less than 10 sa of building replacement cost. * * * Significant damage:Repair Cost likely less than?O. of budding replacement cost. * * Substantial damage:Repair Cost likely less than 403;,of building replacement cost. * Severe damage:Repair Cost likely greater than 40"")of building replacement cost. RE CovtRY:An estimate of the MINIMUM timeframe to carry out sufficient repairs and to remove major safety hazards and obsta- cles to regain occupancy and use of the building,but not necessarily restore it to its full intended functions. *, *, * * r` immediately to days:The expected performance will likely result in people being able to quickly re-enter and resume use of the building hon immediately to a few days,excluding external factors. 1 * * * * Within days to weeks:The expected performance may result in delay of minimum operational use for days to weeks.excluding external factors * * ,* Within weeks to months:The expected performance may result in delay of minimum operational use for weeks to months,excluding extol nal tactors. * * Within months to a year:Expected performance may result in delay of minimum operational use for months to a year * More than one year:Expected performance may result in delay of minimum operational use for at least one year or more As part of the WRK seismic evaluation,they will provide the approximate"as-built" USRC Building Ratings to clearly communicate the expected current building performance. Subsequently, a menu of seismic strengthening options will be developed to raise the "as-built" rating into alignment with the desired performance rating (i.e. raise building to 3-star performance).This will be accomplished by addressing all the known deficiencies using the ASCE 41-17 Tier 2 procedures. Where appropriate, strengthening options will be identified and presented to the City to determine the best value concepts for achieving the desired target building rating. Considerations such as construction impacts to building occupants, construction phasing, and cost effectiveness will be incorporated into the discussion of best value concepts. Page 3 of 4