Laserfiche WebLink
structure will be screened and will creaie no visual impacts for any of the <br />adjoining properties. (Exhibit 1, Hunt testimony) <br />15. In an R-3 zone, the maximum height allowed for struct��res withou>. <br />variances is 35 feet. The City determined ihat the height of the <br />monopole and the small area of the easement results in ihe structure not <br />being totaily compatible with surrounding residential land uses. High <br />voitage pawer lines are present near the site at the Interstate 5 right-oi- <br />way south of the project. The power lines are significantly higher than <br />the monopole, as proposed by the Applicant, and have been compatible <br />with Lhe ad,'oining properties. The propased nonopole can be <br />compatible with adjoinirrg uses because it u�iill be behind tal; evergreen <br />and deciduous trees on-site, and additional landscaping will reduce �?her <br />impacts. (Siddiq testimony) <br />16. The City submittsd that the 12 ;c 20 fcot, or 240 sqiiare foot, equfpment <br />vault and the two attached air conditioning units eight feet in height, are <br />compatible with the adjunct R-3 uses in the area, including garages and <br />tool sheds. The slructures H;ill be located on the east property line <br />adjace�i co the Inierstate 5 corridor and will be sr,reened with existing <br />trees and shrubs. The struc(ures should not be visible to the <br />southbound iraffic alor,g ihe Interstate 5 corridor or firom adjoining <br />properties. (Siddiq lestimony) <br />17. The City submitted that the Applicant must submit a landscape plan. It <br />shall address screening to mitigate any visual impacts of the monopole, <br />the equipment shelter and the air-conditioning units. The Applicant and <br />a representative of the nursing and retirement home indicated that they <br />were well aware of the visual impacts on the nursing and retirement <br />home, but did not feel that significant screening was necessary. (Hunt <br />testimony, Lopes testimony) <br />18. No signs are proposed for the project. (Exhibit 1J <br />19. The interstate 5 corridor is designated as a"gateway corridor" of the City <br />of Everett. Urban Design Policy #6, as set forth in the Everett <br />Compreher.sive Plan, requires that properties abutting the designated <br />gateway corridors should be of a quality that upgrades and enhancos ihe <br />aesthetic character of the City in general. (Exhibit 1) <br />20. In R-3 zones there are no landscape standards for above ground <br />utili�ies, and the landscaping slandarcis are the discretion of the decision <br />maker in tl�e Special Property Use Permit review process. According to <br />�� <br />I <br />