My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2520 MADISON ST VERIZON ANTENNA 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
MADISON ST
>
2520
>
VERIZON ANTENNA
>
2520 MADISON ST VERIZON ANTENNA 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2018 1:46:09 PM
Creation date
11/13/2018 11:52:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
MADISON ST
Street Number
2520
Tenant Name
VERIZON ANTENNA
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
structure will be screened and will creaie no visual impacts for any of the <br />adjoining properties. (Exhibit 1, Hunt testimony) <br />15. In an R-3 zone, the maximum height allowed for struct��res withou>. <br />variances is 35 feet. The City determined ihat the height of the <br />monopole and the small area of the easement results in ihe structure not <br />being totaily compatible with surrounding residential land uses. High <br />voitage pawer lines are present near the site at the Interstate 5 right-oi- <br />way south of the project. The power lines are significantly higher than <br />the monopole, as proposed by the Applicant, and have been compatible <br />with Lhe ad,'oining properties. The propased nonopole can be <br />compatible with adjoinirrg uses because it u�iill be behind tal; evergreen <br />and deciduous trees on-site, and additional landscaping will reduce �?her <br />impacts. (Siddiq testimony) <br />16. The City submittsd that the 12 ;c 20 fcot, or 240 sqiiare foot, equfpment <br />vault and the two attached air conditioning units eight feet in height, are <br />compatible with the adjunct R-3 uses in the area, including garages and <br />tool sheds. The slructures H;ill be located on the east property line <br />adjace�i co the Inierstate 5 corridor and will be sr,reened with existing <br />trees and shrubs. The struc(ures should not be visible to the <br />southbound iraffic alor,g ihe Interstate 5 corridor or firom adjoining <br />properties. (Siddiq lestimony) <br />17. The City submitted that the Applicant must submit a landscape plan. It <br />shall address screening to mitigate any visual impacts of the monopole, <br />the equipment shelter and the air-conditioning units. The Applicant and <br />a representative of the nursing and retirement home indicated that they <br />were well aware of the visual impacts on the nursing and retirement <br />home, but did not feel that significant screening was necessary. (Hunt <br />testimony, Lopes testimony) <br />18. No signs are proposed for the project. (Exhibit 1J <br />19. The interstate 5 corridor is designated as a"gateway corridor" of the City <br />of Everett. Urban Design Policy #6, as set forth in the Everett <br />Compreher.sive Plan, requires that properties abutting the designated <br />gateway corridors should be of a quality that upgrades and enhancos ihe <br />aesthetic character of the City in general. (Exhibit 1) <br />20. In R-3 zones there are no landscape standards for above ground <br />utili�ies, and the landscaping slandarcis are the discretion of the decision <br />maker in tl�e Special Property Use Permit review process. According to <br />�� <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.