Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> Conclusion: This project will not adversely impact the surrounding residential 12nd ��ses. <br /> 2. Antennas associated with above ground utility of communication fa�:ilities shall be iocated <br /> on existing or replacement towers or structures to the maximum extent technically feaslble <br /> to discourage the proliferetion of tower structures. <br /> Findin : The antennas are located on a BPA ulility pole, thus eliminating the need to build a new <br /> tower. <br /> Conclusion: By locating on a utility pole, this project eliminates the need to build a new freastanding <br /> tower. <br /> 3. Tawer structures for above ground utility and/or communications facilities shall not be <br /> located ir or within 300 feet of residentially zones areas. <br /> Finding; This is an existing wireless communication facilily which is being relocated to an existing BPA <br /> utility pole. <br /> Conclusion: This is not a tower structure <br /> 4. When tower structures for above�round utility andlor communications facilities are <br /> proposed to be located within 300 feet of residentially zoned areas, in or within 200 feet of <br /> gateway corridors as designat5d by the Everett Comprehensive Plan, or in or within 200 <br /> feet or areas under the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program,zones which <br /> otherwise require Review Procc+ss II shall use Review Process III. <br /> Findin : The proposed project is located in an R-3 zone and is subjecl to Section 41.150.0 and <br /> Subsection 41.150.D.i.c (Special Property Use Permits) of the Everett Municipal Code. <br /> Conclusion: Pursuant to the requirements of Re�diew Process II, a Notice of Decision will be issued to <br /> property owners within 300 (eet of the subject site. A 14-day appeals period will be effeciive from the <br /> date of issuance. <br /> 5. All utility and communication facilities shall be installed underground or within structures <br /> to the greatest extent practical in order to maximize safety and minimize visual and noise <br /> impacts upon surrounding properties. <br /> Findin : Due to the "line of site" nature of radio frequency transmissions, it is not practical or <br /> technicaliy feasibie to underground an antenna. All above ground support equipment wiil be screened <br /> by a sight-obscuring fence. <br /> Conclusion: Undergrounding of the antennas is inconsistent with the technological needs cf wireless <br /> communi�ation facilities. <br /> 6. Above ground and communications facilities shall be designed so as to be lowest helght <br /> possible to adequately serve the needs of the public for the proposed utility of communication <br /> service. <br /> 9 <br />