Ordinance 2021-94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Desired mode-of-travel participation rates are assumed for each travel mode by Planning subarea. They are listed in Table 4 and include these transit, rideshare, non-motorized, and demand management travel measures: a) Percent of persons using single occupant vehicles during peak periods b) Percent of persons using transit of total peak period travel c) Percent of persons carpooling and vanpooling of peak period travel (all trips taken with 2 or more persons in the vehicle) d) Percent pedestrian and bicycle of peak travel e) Percent trip substitution or elimination (such as telecommuting or not making a planned/forecast trip through substitution) The values in Table 4 become the mode-of-travel assumptions for subareas and the City Planning Area and provide the modal assumptions for the maintaining concurrency. Mode-of-travel assumptions define the desired performance level for various travel modes • in each planning subarea, based on the investment strategy, but do not prescribe differential levels that may be appropriate on specific routes or in travel corridors. To address the variations in route function among the City's travel routes, route-specific assumptions could be established through more detailed planning, following adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. These more specific assumptions could establish the appropriate mix of modes necessary to serve the purposes of the specific land use and circulation environments planned along the route, and would assist in design and allocation of transportation resources to projects and programs. Route-specific assumptions would match the proposed land use purposes along the route with the type and expected performance of the routes themselves. However, subarea mode-of-travel participation assumptions (shown below in Table 4) provide an appropriate level of detail for the Preferred Plan. Table 2 Mode of Travel Participation Assumptions by Subarea REVISED 'SUB-AREAS I SOV% Transit% Carpool % Ped/Bike%Substitute 0/ TOTALS ALTERNATIVES I 1993 Existing Average 79.17 3.00 12.50 2.00 3.33 100 Subarea 1 73 5 14 3 5 100 Subarea 2 78 3 14 2 3 100 Subarea 3 87 2 6 2 3 100 Subarea 4 73 4 17 2 4 100 Subarea 5 79 2 14 2 3 100 Subarea 6 85 2 10 1 2 100 Preferred Plan. 2012 64.67 10.83 17.17 3.00 4.33 100 Subarea 1 55 17 19 5 4 100 Subarea 2 64 11 17 4 4 100 Subarea 3 62 12 19 2 5 100 Subarea 4 67 8 18 2 5 100 Subarea 5 67 10 16 3 4 100 Subarea 6 73 7 14 2 4 100 18 9 T-l1 m_1-7