Laserfiche WebLink
Transportation system management is represented specifically by the $8 million signalization <br /> program and indirectly through improvements that utilize existing capacity or maximize <br /> capacity within a corridor. These include improvements in the 112th St. corridor and in all of <br /> the multimodal corridors discussed above. In multimodal corridors, existing lane capacity will <br /> remain constant with improvements focused on moving additional people and goods through <br /> the same physical roadway dimensions. Overall, it is estimated that $15 to $20 million over <br /> the planning period will be devoted to system management improvements. Successful system <br /> management is critical to Everett's ability to accommodate increased travel demand. <br /> Transportation Demand Management <br /> The management of travel demand involves the establishment of programs that effectively <br /> reduce the number of vehicles that must be accommodated on the system and/or the number of <br /> miles traveled by those vehicles. The City is committed to the effective implementation of the <br /> State Commute Trip Reduction Act and has established a program of employer-based tactics <br /> to increase the use of ridesharing, transit, flexible work hours and other trip substitutes. While <br /> no specific resources are identified in the investment strategy, the administrative costs of en- <br /> couraging demand management is assumed under the "administration" category. Since demand <br /> management is key to the success of the Preferred Plan, it is a principal policy feature of the <br /> entire investment program and is carried out through the expansion of alternative travel modes <br /> and improvements that make the management of demand easier than under present conditions. <br /> Regional Project/Program Coordination <br /> Everett is dependent upon the transportation plans, programs and projects of the County, State <br /> and region. Under both State and Federal requirements and guidelines, Everett must co- <br /> ordinate its planning and investments with these regional strategies. In the preparation of <br /> Everett's Comprehensive Plan and Transportation Element, the City has assumed its share of <br /> both regional growth and travel demand. In doing this, the City has followed the Growth <br /> Management Act as well as other State and Federal requirements and guidelines. The share of <br /> responsibility that Everett accepts in its Comprehensive Plan has assumed coordination with <br /> regional interests. Since the County and neighboring jurisdictions have not reached the stage in <br /> their planning processes where specific plans or prioritized investment strategies are available <br /> for review and coordination, the City has made assumptions in its Transportation Element that <br /> are based upon existing plans and information as well as an application of Growth <br /> Management Act Principles. These assumptions must eventually be compared to assumptions <br /> developed by the County, State and other jurisdictions. Interlocal agreements are proposed for <br /> the unincorporated parts of the City's Planning Area to formally establish commitments that <br /> assure coordinated planning and implementation programs. The content and basis for these <br /> agreements will be established within six months of Comprehensive Plan adoption. <br /> Transit Plan, Pedestrian/Bicycle Plans, Other Functional Plans <br /> The Transportation Element provides a policy framework for all transportation functional <br /> components, including transit, pedestrian and bicycle elements. The current draft of the <br /> Transit (functional) Element represents a functional amplification of the Transportation <br /> Element. The overall transportation policies reviewed in the Draft EIS and included in the <br /> Preferred Transportation Element represent the conceptual policy basis for all modes of travel <br /> in the Comprehensive Plan. The impacts, mitigation and investment strategy have been <br /> reviewed at a programmatic level and establish an overall commitment to programs identified <br /> in the Draft Transit Element. Additional project environmental review may be required of <br /> specific transit projects or programs prior to implementation. <br /> 194 <br /> T-36 <br />