Laserfiche WebLink
MAY -es -se 15=32 FROM�EVERET/T PLANNING DEPT I0.425257e742 PAGE 1/3 <br />l i <br />Findings: Under Subsection 34,030.A, the required amount of off-street parking <br />spaces is determined on a case -by -case basis. <br />Conclusions: The existing on -site parking provides adequate off-street parking. <br />No additional parking spaces will be required. <br />5. Compatibility of proposed structures and Improvements with surrounding <br />properties, including the size, height, location, setback and arrangement of all <br />proposed buildings and facilities, especially as they relate to light and shadow <br />impacts on more sensitive: land uses and less Intensive zones. <br />Findings: The panels will be approximately eight feet above the roofs parapet <br />and ten feet from the edge of the building. The building is over 100 feet high. <br />Corn:lusions: The antennas will not be noticeable except from nearby buildings. <br />No shadow will be cast onto adjacent properties. <br />6. The number, size and location of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive <br />land uses. <br />Findings: Sign Category C applies to the proposed use. No sign is proposed. <br />Conclusions: All signage must meet Subsection 36.170.0 of the zoning code <br />7. The landscaping, buffering and screening of buildings, parking, loading and <br />storage areas, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. <br />Findings: No landscaping is proposed. <br />Conclusions: No landscaping is required. <br />8. The generation of nuisance irritants such as noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual <br />blight or other undesirable impacts. <br />Findings: The applicant states that the proposal will not create any nuisance <br />irritants. <br />Conclusions: The use should not generate any nuisance irritants. <br />9. Consistency with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the area <br />and land use designation in which the property is located. <br />Findings: 2930 Wetmore Avenue is designated 3.1. Central Business District, by <br />the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Conclusions: The proposal aPpears to be consistent with the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />Post -if' Fax Note 7671 <br />r <br />r.� <br />comsp. <br />co. <br />ph, 0 <br />MOM # <br />Fnf ryeps= <br />Fax f <br />