My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6502 EVERGREEN WAY ENHANCED SERVICE FACILITIES 2020-01-21
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
6502
>
ENHANCED SERVICE FACILITIES
>
6502 EVERGREEN WAY ENHANCED SERVICE FACILITIES 2020-01-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2020 9:13:55 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 3:24:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
6502
Tenant Name
ENHANCED SERVICE FACILITIES
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
541
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 6 <br /> have these issues been addressed? I want to ensure that the issue has been <br /> adequately taken care of or designed around rather than not shown on these plans <br /> and creating issues during construction. <br /> Driveway updated to match detail #315.. Spots, contour labels and slopes have <br /> been added to make the proposed grading clearer. <br /> The power poles will remain and an 8'walk is proposed. <br /> 3. Sheet C-10: Please label all stall dimensions to ensure that it complies with COE <br /> Standard Drawing # 340. I've measured the plans and they appear to be in <br /> compliance; however, the contractor needs to know the exact dimensions <br /> proposed. Please also label all compact stalls as such. <br /> All proposed stalls are dimensioned. Existing stalls are now labeled as existing, <br /> k. Sheet C-II, C-12, C-13, and C-14: The City's 'Design and Construction Standards <br /> and Specifications for Development' manual (DCSS) was updated at the end of <br /> 2016. This update has some significant changes including updates to standard <br /> names and numbers. Please conduct a thorough review of all reference callouts and <br /> added details to ensure that the correct name and standard drawing number are <br /> reflected in the revised plans. The City feels that it is best to reference the current <br /> standards online rather than showing the details in the plans; however we will allow <br /> the details to be included in the plans if they are current and an additional note is <br /> added that directs the contractor to the online (current) standards. <br /> Details updated to the current 2017 standards. Note added for contractor. <br /> 2. The comments below were generated from this project's Stormwater Reviewer. If you <br /> have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Erik Emerson with the City <br /> of Everett Surface Water Department (425-257-8995 or EEmerson©everettwa.gov). <br /> a. It appears that the proposed design is based, at least partially, on older <br /> stormwater standards. It appears that the application of the new stormwater <br /> standards may require significant changes to the design. As such I am providing a <br /> partial review since it Is likely the design will change. <br /> b. Storm Drainage Report Comments; <br /> 1. The project must be designed in accordance with the current City of <br /> Everett Stormwater Management Manual (Manual) and the City's 'Design <br /> and Construction Standards and Specifications for Development' (DeSS) <br /> manual. <br /> i. Please note that the current Stormwater Manual is the Department <br /> of Ecology's 2012 Stormwater Management Manual for Western <br /> Washington, as amended in 2014 (2014 SWMMWW) with City- <br /> Specific Amendments per Chapter 4 of the DCSS. <br /> Storm water report is revised to meet the current manual. <br /> 2. Since the existing site has more than 35% impervious coverage the <br /> "Redevelopment" standard must be applied in accordance with Section 2.4.2 <br /> of the Manual and Figure 2.4.2 of Volume 1 of the Manual. The drainage <br /> report appears to not have tracked through the flow chart completely. It <br /> appears likely that the project will be required to meet Minimum <br /> requirements (MRs) # 1 through 9 for all new and replaced hard surfaces, <br /> but the applicant should verify this based on the criteria included in the flow <br /> chart, including the value based determination for replaced hard surfaces. <br /> Include documentation of the thresholds determination in the drainage <br /> report. A highlighted flow chart is preferred. <br /> Flow charts are added to Min Req #1 <br /> P:\2016\16153 ESF&Retail everett\P&E\Text\Correspondence\Everett let review.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.