Laserfiche WebLink
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE REVIEW <br /> Project Title: <br /> CT SWIFT II BRT— Boeing to Canyon Park Stations 60% Review <br /> Job Charge: Reviewed By: Office&Mail Stop: Phone: Date: Spapt <br /> WO# Euneka Richards Traffic Operations 425-257-8926 8-2-16 of <br /> # Sht/Pg Reviewer's Comment Designer's Response Init. <br /> 6 TS-10.2 Per MUTCD 4E.11 paragraph 20 please remove the "Road"from "Airport See response for Comment#5. Casseday <br /> Road" in all messages in the Voice to walk message Schedule <br /> 7 TS-10.2 Please show the ped push button symbol on the opposite side of the PPB See response for Comment#5. Casseday <br /> pole such that the APS station is facing the intersection <br /> 8 TS-11.1 Please review the vehicle signal head diagram versus existing conditions Signal modifications at this location will Casseday <br /> and versus the plan sheet. I believe head 43 is not depicted correctly, head be limited to installation of two loops in <br /> 34 is listed twice in 2 different configurations,and you are missing a the vicinity of the northbound bus station <br /> westbound follow through head on the signal pole in the NW corner. at this location. Signal head references <br /> are not relevant to the design and will be <br /> eliminated. <br /> 9 TS-11.1 Replace all PED heads with count down models. APS/PPB Poles all corners. Per meeting on 9/7/16 between Ryan Casseday <br /> Sass and June DeVoll, Community <br /> Transit and the Swift II project will not <br /> replace pedestrian signal heads or add <br /> APS/PPB at the Kasch Park Road <br /> signal. <br /> 10 TS-11.1 Dual indication (only 4 sections) See response for Comment#8. Casseday <br /> 11 C3.27 Our data shows damaged pavement from SWIFT I stop locations extends Field data from the existing Swift stations Otak <br /> C3.29 100' in front of current SWIFT stations. Please extend the cement concrete along SR 99 was analyzed to determine <br /> C3.30 pad in front of each stop from 60'to 100' adding 20'on each side of the the need for extended concrete pads. It <br /> C3.31 currently shown pad. appears that the proposed concrete pads <br /> C3.33 will be sufficient based on existing <br /> pavement rutting. Per meeting on 9/7/16 <br /> between Ryan Sass and June DeVoll, <br /> the design team will evaluate on a site by <br /> site basis to confirm these dimensions. <br /> Swift II BRT Everett Comment Sheet 60 Stations_OtakResponse.docx <br />